Question Kunena Discuss: Can not make it work

It might be better to discuss this "offline" - see my PM to you. Maybe it's just a question of terminology?

UPDATE - Managed to map the individual sub-cagtegories easily enough with a bit of Excel help. So the mapping field contains a somewhat unwieldy


14,36;15,36;16,36;17,36;18,36;19,36;20,36;21,36;22,36;23,36;24,36;25,36;26,36;27,36;28,36;29,36;30,36;31,36;32,36;33,36;34,36;35,36;36,36;37,36;38,36;39,36;40,36;41,36;42,36;43,36;44,36;45,36;46,36;47,36;48,36;49,36;50,36;51,36;52,36;53,36;54,36;55,36;56,36;57,36;58,36;59,36;60,36;61,36;62,36;63,36;64,36;65,36;66,36;67,36;68,36;69,36;70,36;71,36;72,36;73,36;74,36;75,36;76,36;77,36;78,36;91,35;92,35;93,35;94,35;95,35;96,35;97,35;98,35;99,35;100,35;101,35;102,35;103,35;104,35;105,35;106,35;107,35;108,35;109,35;110,35;111,35;112,35;113,35;114,35;115,35;116,35;117,35;118,35;119,35;120,35;121,35;122,35;123,35;124,35;125,35;126,35;127,35;128,35;129,35;130,35;131,35;132,35;133,35;134,35;135,35;136,35;137,35;138,35;139,35;81,37;82,37;83,37;84,37;85,37;86,37;87,37;


but it's working exactly as we want it to.

Thanks for the update. I still feel that there's an easier way but, if you're happy, maybe we should just leave this alone. On the other hand, did you receive my PM?

The short answer, however, is that J! 2.5 content "sub-categories" have cat-ids just like J! 2.5 content parent categories. As far as Kunena Discuss is concerned, it's a matter of mapping individual content cat-ids to Kunena cat-ids. You can't take a kind of "short cut", that is, you can't map a content category to a Kunena category and expect that the rule will apply to any/all content sub-categories. You have to map them all individually.

This also means that, if your content sub-categories grow in number, you will have to continually update the Kunena Discuss mapping rule.