Question Crypsis Bootstrap 3 Template Beta?

I have been playing with the new Crypsis template for Bootstrap 3 templates and have managed to get it to work with a couple of small changes. Our template is a Joostrap template which is practically straight Bootstrap 3.

The first is that we need to define a new CSS rule in our CSS override file:

This forces the table to fit within the allocated container area, otherwise the display stretches all over our template columns to to right thus making the modules located on the right hand side of the page impossible to read

The second change we suspect is a coding bug in the file: com_kunena/templates/crypsisb3/layouts/categoryitem/default.php.

The determinations of the column width for the subject column is determined at the top of the file (line 15) based upon whether the field $this->checkbox is set as follows:

If it is empty, as is our situation the value of cols is set to 5.

However the test in the column header for the column where (we presume) the checkbox would be displayed is testing the field $this->topicActions, and is as follows:
If we count up the number of col-md-x values we have 1 (icon) +5 (subject) +2 (replies) +3 (last post) +1 (actions) which makes 12 (as intended).

Unfortunately in our case the value of $this->topicActions is null and hence the sum of the col comes to 11, which does not fill the table width, leaving a extra space after the last displayed column.

I suspect that either the two tests should be made the same or alternatively switch the empty test results so that on line 15 the default is 6 if the $this->checkbox field is empty.

I did try setting up a CSS rule for the last displayed td column to fill the width but this tended to swash up the subject column and made the table display a little unbalanced.

Found the issue with closing user dropdown, plus closing buttons on click.

After next version, the default jquery/bootstrap will be removed.

So its loading your templates bootstrap and jquery versions.

Anything new in the 4.0.3 version? Or do the numbers just change with the version of Kunena?

For what it's worth, you may be interested in reading 810's comment in another topic and my response .

From what I have read, there are proposed changes forecast for J! 3.7:

3.7 Add bootstrap compatibility layer as a Joomla layer to allow different versions of bootstrap or other CSS style frameworks to be used.

Until then, we may just have to hold our [collective] breaths.

sozzled wrote: For what it's worth, you may be interested in reading 810's comment in another topic and my response .

From what I have read, there are proposed changes forecast for J! 3.7:

3.7 Add bootstrap compatibility layer as a Joomla layer to allow different versions of bootstrap or other CSS style frameworks to be used.

Until then, we may just have to hold our [collective] breaths.

Thanks for the infos. So i think i'll update to 4.0.4 as soon as it is released and use the Blue Eagle template for the time being.

Thanks for all the work. Your an awesome team with an awesome project

betteryouthanme wrote:

sozzled wrote: For what it's worth, you may be interested in reading 810's comment in another topic and my response .

From what I have read, there are proposed changes forecast for J! 3.7:

3.7 Add bootstrap compatibility layer as a Joomla layer to allow different versions of bootstrap or other CSS style frameworks to be used.

Until then, we may just have to hold our [collective] breaths.

Thanks for the infos. So i think i'll update to 4.0.4 as soon as it is released and use the Blue Eagle template for the time being.

Thanks for all the work. Your an awesome team with an awesome project

I think I will do the same, I want to port my community over to 100% native Joomla ASAP and it looks like Blue Eagle is the only way this is going to happen (at least this year).

I also want to thank you and 810 for the excellent work, I think it will be well worth the wait!