The Kunena team has announce the arrival of Kunena 6.3.0 [K 6.3.0] in stable which is now available for download as a native Joomla extension for J! 4.4.x/5.0.x/5.1.x. This version addresses most of the issues that were discovered in K 6.2 and issues discovered during the last development stages of K 6.3
for questions commonly asked or "how to" in nature (see the FAQs menu tab above);
for help with Kunena versions that are not the latest stable release; or
for general Joomla or website administration matters
You must include your K 2.0 configuration report; if you do not include your configuration report, your topic may be closed (locked) or deleted without any further warnings from the moderators.
K 2.0 support will cease on 31 August 2013 and this section of the forum will be closed and archived after that time and no further questions will be answered about this version.
Hi, I have the latest Joomla 2.5.9 and just installed Kunena 2.04 latest Kunena forum version today. First of all congrats, the new Kunena version is much faster!
The one bad thing I've found, is the RSS feed isn't correct with the new version. When you click on the feed icon, instead of showing a feed, it reverts to the regular Kunena page. Perhaps the url or rss generator is wrong?
Yes, it's enabled.. The icon itself has the wrong url in it.. When I manually change the url I can see the feed. When I use the same url structure and change it to: forum/recent/sel-720?format=feed&type=rss I can see the feeds..
However in my install, the feed logo has this url structure: forum/recent/sel-168.feed?type=rss
Hi, yes that did resolve it actually, and the sel-168.feed works. The problem is, is I need to leave the suffix on though for SEO purposes unfortunately. With the .html suffix on, if I use the same url structure like Kunena has in this forum (with "sel-720?" as part of the url structure) it works too..
I'm not sure why my rss icon generates sel-168 and other sites have sel-720 though? In my RSS reader I guess I could just manually change the url to the 720, I guess I'm only concerned about it possibly generating duplicate urls or content in the search engines.