Kunena 7.0.4 Released
The Kunena team has announce the arrival of Kunena 7.0.4 [K 7.0.4] in stable which is now available for download as a native Joomla extension for J! 5.4.x/6.0.x. This version addresses most of the issues that were discovered in K 6.2 / K 6.3 / K 6.4 and issues discovered during the last development stages of K 7.0
Topics contains old discussions (generally more than one year ago or based on circumstances that subsequently changed) or topics resolved in other ways. Topics moved into this category are closed from further discussion.
Question The "longer-term" of Kunena 1.0.10
16 years 10 months ago - 16 years 10 months ago #19143
by sozzled
Blue Eagle vs. Crypsis reference guide
Read my blog and
The "longer-term" of Kunena 1.0.10 was created by sozzled
First of all I want to thank the moderator team for their efforts to collect information about
problems/defects/solutions/workarounds in Kunena 1.0.10
. I do not, for one moment, want to criticise nor diminish that effort. 
I am concerned, however, for the longer-term future of what has been announced to be an "end-of-life" product, namely K 1.0.10. For some people, going forward with Kunena will not be an option because they will be constrained their dependence on a specific version of Joomla and other extensions they've chosen. For some people, migrating to K 1.5 will not be possible and, therefore, they will need continued support for a period of time with the last version of Kunena that will operate in their environment.
If there's an intention to release one final J! 1.0/J! 1.5 legacy-compatible release of Kunena before the lights go out on K 1.0.x development, I should stop right here. :blush: As I have not seen any evidence of intentions to release a K 1.0.10 "bugfix" version (and to do so would derail the K 1.5 development effort) I think we should consider a better method than a "solutions/tutorials topic" in order to help existing and future new users who are contrained by J! 1.0.
Again I mean no disrespect to the moderators but I wonder if we could have some clues, please, in terms of what isses are essential bugfixes and what issues are less-critical, non-critical or merely of "curiosity value" to the K 1.0.10 user base?
I would like to help this effort but first of all I'm looking for a consolidated list of genuinely critical defects that will not be corrected in the K 1.0.x series. Can anyone help me with that, please?
I am concerned, however, for the longer-term future of what has been announced to be an "end-of-life" product, namely K 1.0.10. For some people, going forward with Kunena will not be an option because they will be constrained their dependence on a specific version of Joomla and other extensions they've chosen. For some people, migrating to K 1.5 will not be possible and, therefore, they will need continued support for a period of time with the last version of Kunena that will operate in their environment.
If there's an intention to release one final J! 1.0/J! 1.5 legacy-compatible release of Kunena before the lights go out on K 1.0.x development, I should stop right here. :blush: As I have not seen any evidence of intentions to release a K 1.0.10 "bugfix" version (and to do so would derail the K 1.5 development effort) I think we should consider a better method than a "solutions/tutorials topic" in order to help existing and future new users who are contrained by J! 1.0.
Again I mean no disrespect to the moderators but I wonder if we could have some clues, please, in terms of what isses are essential bugfixes and what issues are less-critical, non-critical or merely of "curiosity value" to the K 1.0.10 user base?
I would like to help this effort but first of all I'm looking for a consolidated list of genuinely critical defects that will not be corrected in the K 1.0.x series. Can anyone help me with that, please?
Blue Eagle vs. Crypsis reference guide
Read my blog and
Last edit: 16 years 10 months ago by sozzled.
The topic has been locked.
- johnnydement
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 934
- Thank you received: 5
16 years 10 months ago #19157
by johnnydement
Replied by johnnydement on topic Re: The "longer-term" of Kunena 1.0.10
It depends on the bugs found in 1.0.10. Stable Final releases have also bugs, depending on the severity of these, 1.0.x may have a service release to fix them, as well as if a j! vulnerability that could affect kunena is found.
The topic has been locked.
16 years 10 months ago #19190
by nzjacob
Replied by nzjacob on topic Re: The "longer-term" of Kunena 1.0.10
If people are tied into J 1.0 .. which has no active development or bug fixes .. and the developer of thier critical component has gone or refusses to move on also, then surely the current K1.0.10 will no doubt suit thier needs too.
I don't see why the development team should continue to focus on a component for a Joomla version that the Joomla team themselves have essentially abandoned also. J1.6 is just around the corner.
J1.5 native support is the number 1 request on uservioce by 2:1 and sometimes "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few."
I don't see why the development team should continue to focus on a component for a Joomla version that the Joomla team themselves have essentially abandoned also. J1.6 is just around the corner.
J1.5 native support is the number 1 request on uservioce by 2:1 and sometimes "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few."
The topic has been locked.
16 years 10 months ago #19209
by Matias
Replied by Matias on topic Re:The "longer-term" of Kunena 1.0.10
I would be happy to release Kunena 1.0.11, but only if someone else than me volunteers to do the hard job: collect all bug fixes to the same "build" and sends it to me.
Almost all the fixes can be found from /trunk/1.5 tree in our SVN and many of them should be relatively easy to convert to K1.0.10 as they share most of the code.
In my current situation I'm not willing to merge fixes to K1.0 tree by myself because of doing so would delay Kunena 1.5 for another week or so. I don't know how many days I have left before our new baby is born and after that I will have very limited time to work with Kunena, at least for few weeks. So I'm trying to make best use for the time I have left and trying to make Kunena 1.5.2 Stable our best release ever.
So I'm asking for your help. We clearly need to fix the worst issues in Kunena 1.0.10, but currently our development team just doesn't have the time to do it. I can lead the effort, but I don't want to spend another week or so doing it.
Almost all the fixes can be found from /trunk/1.5 tree in our SVN and many of them should be relatively easy to convert to K1.0.10 as they share most of the code.
In my current situation I'm not willing to merge fixes to K1.0 tree by myself because of doing so would delay Kunena 1.5 for another week or so. I don't know how many days I have left before our new baby is born and after that I will have very limited time to work with Kunena, at least for few weeks. So I'm trying to make best use for the time I have left and trying to make Kunena 1.5.2 Stable our best release ever.
So I'm asking for your help. We clearly need to fix the worst issues in Kunena 1.0.10, but currently our development team just doesn't have the time to do it. I can lead the effort, but I don't want to spend another week or so doing it.
The topic has been locked.
16 years 10 months ago - 16 years 10 months ago #19210
by Matias
Replied by Matias on topic Re:The "longer-term" of Kunena 1.0.10
The best way to provide fixes to me would be to use svn:
This is how you do it by using command line:
Make your fixes, test that they work
And send the diff to me.
Just remember to add comment to CHANGELOG.php what you were fixing.
For advanced users: You can also merge fixes from K1.5 tree, but that needs more skills as there are conflicts between the files. Maybe easiest way would be to checkout trunk/1.5 tree and make diffs like this:
Then you can look at the changes and rewrite them in /trunk/1.0
Diff format:
File to be changed
-[old line number],[lines to change] +[new line number],[lines after change]
- removed line
+ added line
other lines stay the same.
This is how you do it by using command line:
Code:
svn checkout http://joomlacode.org/svn/kunena/trunk/1.0
Make your fixes, test that they work
Code:
svn up
svn diff
For advanced users: You can also merge fixes from K1.5 tree, but that needs more skills as there are conflicts between the files. Maybe easiest way would be to checkout trunk/1.5 tree and make diffs like this:
Code:
svn diff -r827:828
Diff format:
Code:
Index: trunk/1.5/components/com_kunena/lib/kunena.parser.php
===================================================================
--- trunk/1.5/components/com_kunena/lib/kunena.parser.php (revision 827)
+++ trunk/1.5/components/com_kunena/lib/kunena.parser.php (revision 828)
Code:
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
Code:
defined( '_JEXEC' ) or die('Restricted access');
-include_once("kunena.parser.bbcode.php");
+include_once(KUNENA_PATH_LIB .DS. "kunena.parser.bbcode.php");
class KunenaBBCodeInterpreter extends BBCodeInterpreter {
# these are samples... we used the parser to refer to files!
Index: trunk/1.5/components/com_kunena/CHANGELOG.php
+ added line
other lines stay the same.
Last edit: 16 years 10 months ago by Matias.
The topic has been locked.
16 years 10 months ago #19219
by xillibit
I don't provide support by PM, because this can be useful for someone else.
Matias wrote:
it need login and passwordThe best way to provide fixes to me would be to use svn:
This is how you do it by using command line:
Code:svn checkout http://joomlacode.org/svn/kunena/trunk/1.0
I don't provide support by PM, because this can be useful for someone else.
The topic has been locked.
Time to create page: 0.300 seconds