Kunena 6.1.3.2 Released
The Kunena team has announce the arrival of Kunena 6.1.3.2 [K 6.1.3] which is now available for download as a native Joomla extension for J! 4.2.x/4.3.x. This version addresses most of the issues that were discovered in K 6.1.0 and issues discovered during the last development stages of K 6.1
Idea
W3C Validation Kunena 4.0.10
7 years 6 months ago - 7 years 6 months ago #1
by Trony
Music and Electronic Devices Designer. Drum and Bass Addict. Creative Mind as Lifestyle. Cat in past Life. Soccer, Ice Hockey and Snowboard Lover.
W3C Validation Kunena 4.0.10 was created by Trony
For W3C Validation,
I modded these files:
1) com_kunena -> lib -> kunena.link.class.php
and
2) com_kunena -> views -> common -> view.html.php
I removed All 'follow' in $rel
3) libraries -> kunena -> view.php
I changed this:
With this:
and
with this:
What do you think ?!?
I modded these files:
1) com_kunena -> lib -> kunena.link.class.php
and
2) com_kunena -> views -> common -> view.html.php
I removed All 'follow' in $rel
3) libraries -> kunena -> view.php
I changed this:
Code:
return JHtml::_('kunenaforum.link', $category->getUri(), $content, $title, $class, 'follow');
With this:
Code:
return JHtml::_('kunenaforum.link', $category->getUri(), $content, $title, $class, 'category');
and
Code:
if (!$content)
{
$content = KunenaHtmlParser::parseText($topic->subject);
}
$rel = 'follow';
with this:
Code:
if (!$content)
{
$content = KunenaHtmlParser::parseText($topic->subject);
}
$rel = 'bookmark';
What do you think ?!?
Music and Electronic Devices Designer. Drum and Bass Addict. Creative Mind as Lifestyle. Cat in past Life. Soccer, Ice Hockey and Snowboard Lover.
Last edit: 7 years 6 months ago by Trony.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ChaosHead
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
7 years 6 months ago #2
by 810
Replied by 810 on topic W3C Validation Kunena 4.0.10
thats wrong, rel have 2 options: 1) nofollow or 2) follow
The following user(s) said Thank You: Trony
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
7 years 6 months ago - 7 years 6 months ago #3
by Trony
Music and Electronic Devices Designer. Drum and Bass Addict. Creative Mind as Lifestyle. Cat in past Life. Soccer, Ice Hockey and Snowboard Lover.
Replied by Trony on topic W3C Validation Kunena 4.0.10
I Agree with you but W3C suggestes rel=bookmark and remove follow. (nofollow and category is ok).
Yandex Validator recognizes the rel bookmark in rdfanode.
I don't know. It's strange but...
Yandex Validator recognizes the rel bookmark in rdfanode.
I don't know. It's strange but...
Music and Electronic Devices Designer. Drum and Bass Addict. Creative Mind as Lifestyle. Cat in past Life. Soccer, Ice Hockey and Snowboard Lover.
Last edit: 7 years 6 months ago by Trony.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
7 years 5 months ago - 7 years 5 months ago #4
by ice99
As far as i know - "follow" was removed in HTML5.
Here is available links
www.w3schools.com/tags/att_a_rel.asp
Some other rel-attributes exist ("bookmark" i.e.)
Trony variant seems acceptable, (anyway validator.w3.org/ show no errors).
Can you fix it in future versions? Anyway, please:
1. Tell why you made a decision - include rel="follow"?
2. What do you think about Trony variant?
3. How totally remove rel="follow" from template?
Also look at your sourcecode
<a class="ktoggler close" title="Collapse" rel="kprofilebox"></a>
And few others break validity of a code.
Can you (or me myself) remove it without affecting functionality of forum?
Also lightbox attachments generate rel="lightbox[thumb23]" - not valid too.
According html5 specification we must change "rel" attribute to "data-rel", which is perfectly valid. I tried, but no luck.
Replied by ice99 on topic W3C Validation Kunena 4.0.10
810 wrote: thats wrong, rel have 2 options: 1) nofollow or 2) follow
As far as i know - "follow" was removed in HTML5.
Here is available links
www.w3schools.com/tags/att_a_rel.asp
Some other rel-attributes exist ("bookmark" i.e.)
Trony variant seems acceptable, (anyway validator.w3.org/ show no errors).
Can you fix it in future versions? Anyway, please:
1. Tell why you made a decision - include rel="follow"?
2. What do you think about Trony variant?
3. How totally remove rel="follow" from template?
Also look at your sourcecode
<a class="ktoggler close" title="Collapse" rel="kprofilebox"></a>
And few others break validity of a code.
Can you (or me myself) remove it without affecting functionality of forum?
Also lightbox attachments generate rel="lightbox[thumb23]" - not valid too.
According html5 specification we must change "rel" attribute to "data-rel", which is perfectly valid. I tried, but no luck.
Last edit: 7 years 5 months ago by ice99.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.495 seconds