Kunena 7.0.4 Released
The Kunena team has announce the arrival of Kunena 7.0.4 [K 7.0.4] in stable which is now available for download as a native Joomla extension for J! 5.4.x/6.0.x. This version addresses most of the issues that were discovered in K 6.2 / K 6.3 / K 6.4 and issues discovered during the last development stages of K 7.0
Solved Help needed: Logs Backend view
2 years 1 month ago #230962
by xillibit
I don't provide support by PM, because this can be useful for someone else.
Replied by xillibit on topic Help needed: Logs Backend view
Hello,
There are news changes today made by Ruud, he has refactored the backend stats so it will be accessible with stats and anymore by statistics.
I'am going to release a beta2 today
There are news changes today made by Ruud, he has refactored the backend stats so it will be accessible with stats and anymore by statistics.
I'am going to release a beta2 today
I don't provide support by PM, because this can be useful for someone else.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
2 years 1 month ago #230976
by Gindi
Replied by Gindi on topic Help needed: Logs Backend view
After all these changes, I noticed another error (?).
In Kunena - Logs is displayed in the menu bar: ID - Time - Type - Operation - User - Category - Topic - Target user - IP - Logs
When I select the filter options I see: Start Date - End Date - Type - Operation - User - Category - Topic - User.
However, the selection field should say "Target user" instead of user.
Gindi
In Kunena - Logs is displayed in the menu bar: ID - Time - Type - Operation - User - Category - Topic - Target user - IP - Logs
When I select the filter options I see: Start Date - End Date - Type - Operation - User - Category - Topic - User.
However, the selection field should say "Target user" instead of user.
Gindi
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
2 years 1 month ago - 2 years 1 month ago #230977
by ruud
sharing = caring
Replied by ruud on topic Help needed: Logs Backend view
Hi Gindi,
Thanks for the feedback and you are correct.
While refactoring the view and filters I try to use as much functionality that Joomla offers out of the box, so instead of creating a kunena (target) user field I used the Joomla build in user field.
Advantage is that this is maintained, has a lot of functionality (like searching for a user), disadvantage is that the 'name' cannot be changed. So we cannot name it target user...
I can also create a kunena user field that can have any name. It would then be a dropdown of all users that actually can be filtered (so do not display users in the list that do not have an entry in the log table), but that will be a dropdown and not the modal popup with all functionality it has now.
So this is I think somewhat personal or depending on the site usage ( few or many users etc)
I am able to create the kunena user fields but want to avoid having to revert that change (as I cannot revert my time
)
Maybe @ritch or @florian can also discuss / make a decision.
What would be your preference Gindi?
Thanks for the feedback and you are correct.
While refactoring the view and filters I try to use as much functionality that Joomla offers out of the box, so instead of creating a kunena (target) user field I used the Joomla build in user field.
Advantage is that this is maintained, has a lot of functionality (like searching for a user), disadvantage is that the 'name' cannot be changed. So we cannot name it target user...
I can also create a kunena user field that can have any name. It would then be a dropdown of all users that actually can be filtered (so do not display users in the list that do not have an entry in the log table), but that will be a dropdown and not the modal popup with all functionality it has now.
So this is I think somewhat personal or depending on the site usage ( few or many users etc)
I am able to create the kunena user fields but want to avoid having to revert that change (as I cannot revert my time
Maybe @ritch or @florian can also discuss / make a decision.
What would be your preference Gindi?
sharing = caring
Last edit: 2 years 1 month ago by ruud.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gindi
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
2 years 1 month ago - 2 years 1 month ago #230978
by Gindi
Replied by Gindi on topic Help needed: Logs Backend view
When searching in the database and in various PHP files, I noticed that instead of "User" it says "User_ID" and is in the database with type int(11). The "Target_User" is also in the database with type int(11).
There are also some entries in the various PHP files that contain "target_user_id".
gindi
There are also some entries in the various PHP files that contain "target_user_id".
gindi
Last edit: 2 years 1 month ago by Gindi.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
2 years 1 month ago #230979
by ruud
sharing = caring
Replied by ruud on topic Help needed: Logs Backend view
Correct, and the first user filter filters on target user where the second filters the user.
So the filters (both) are working correct only the label is for both the same
So the filters (both) are working correct only the label is for both the same
sharing = caring
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
2 years 1 month ago #230982
by ruud
sharing = caring
Replied by ruud on topic Help needed: Logs Backend view
Did a PR so we can compare and decide what is better:
github.com/Kunena/Kunena-Forum/pull/9651
Let me know your thoughts
Let me know your thoughts
sharing = caring
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gindi
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.342 seconds