Solved to big avatar in reply screen

Rudd, the inline styling needs to be removed. As soon as you remove the inline styling of the max-width/height the image is completely responsive and should work great on a mobile phone too. Another alternative to removing the inline styling is for the images to have an applied 100% width to them which will make the max-width/height not negatively effect the images.

Hi, removing the inline styling is not a small change. Returning the avatar is a Kunena function that takes the size as a parameter (post, list, profile, welcome, etc.).
This size is not only returned as inline styling (height and width), but is also used to specify which size avatar image is to be returned.
Omitting this will always return the largest avatar (in my case that is an avatar of 200x200px), if this avatar is then resized to 'list'(36x36px) Google will 'punish' you for using a to large image and then scaling it back > that is not good SEO (pagespeed).

If removing the inline CSS is not an easy option, lets go with plan B. To make the reply preview avatars responsive, change line 118 of /media/kunena/cache/crypsis/css/kunena.css to the following:

Do note that this does slightly effect the avatars on the threads themselves by slightly scaling them down to use more padding. If we want to only effect the reply avatars we would use:

just had the same thought
didn't change the kunena.css file but used my templates css override function
Could also be done using the Kunena's custom.less file

Ideal situation would be (for me at least):
* One avatar class (instead of the current three: img-polaroid, img-thumbnail, img-rounded)
* Avatar class configuration option in Crypsis template (so you can specify your sites avatar class and easily change that)
* autoscaling of avatar to fit 'box': with width: 100% ?

I mentioned the kunena.css file mostly for the Kunena developers themselves. Many of us know that a template override is a much more ideal method considering that any extension mods usually get overridden upon upgrades.

And yes, any three of those methods would help.

now would be the time to have a look at this with the B3 version of crypsis coming I guess a lot code gets 'duplicated' > making a change after that will double the work