sozzled wrote: I was looking at the site for which you posted your K 1.6 configuration report. Are you having a problem with that site? Is your question about having a problem with one site but not with another site?
This
IS the site from which my configuration file came from, evidenced by the Joomla version being 1.6 and not 1.5.. There is a flaw, if you want to call it that, in that your reporting system does not actually notate anywhere that I can see at least where the Joomla folder is located. You simply saw the apache location of christiankeysmashers.com and assumed that was it, where in fact my www service has a rule to route all traffic to christiankeysmashers.com/Joomla/index.php (specifically), so users/visitors don't have to enter the /Joomla/ part, they can simply enter the domain name. Pretty common practice actually, but since the reporting tool doesn't log where the Joomls install is, there's no way that you'd know that.. But again, as I said, the proof (in things being set up and working properly at least from the web point of view) is that the report issued IS for Joomla 1.6.. The 1.5 site that you were at probably had Christian Key Smashers in the title etc, whereas the beta version does not have the cKs banner and instead has the beez_20 I believe it is called stock image.. Hope that clears things up as far as the site is concerned, maybe there's some way you guys could add the actual path info or whatever it's technical name is, might help others down the road, cuz I know according the the Joomla forums, tons of people run various test versions like this.
As far as the configuration.. All I can say is it's identical to the other website, mentioned above.. Both sites are running latest Kunena and Latest modules, the only difference is one's 1.5 and this one I'm discussing is 1.6.
