- Posts: 16
- Thank you received: 0
Kunena 6.1.0 Released
The Kunena team has announce the arrival of Kunena 6.1.0 [K 6.1.0] which is now available for download as a native Joomla extension for J! 4.3.x & J! 4.2.x. This version addresses most of the issues that were discovered in K 6.0 and issues discovered during the development stages of K 6.0
Merged List of Kunena Features
A simple page that gives a check-list of what Kunena will do would save people a whole lot of time hunting for answers to questions like 'Will Kunena do this...?"
I'm sure the info is here & there - in the forums on the wiki etc but you have a lot of wasted space on the front page devoted to "Kunena— A Powerful Forum with a New Direction " - from a 'selling/promotional' perspective everything including & after "Many fixes and new features, which had been planned for past releases but never implemented, have been added...." is wasted space, I don't think too many people are interested in that, they want to know - What does it do? How is it different form others (ie Agora). Is it for me & should I spend time with it?
I'm thinking of:
-
Link Forums to Joomla Section/Categories - Yes/No
New Article comment/Discuss opens new forum thread - Yes/No
Customise Profile fields - Yes/No (we're working on it!)
Allow users to select topics ot 'follow'Yes/No
e-mal updates of 'followed' topics Yes/No
etc ...
If is does exist... I haven't found it
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Kunena K1.5 may be lacking in features but it is still the most popular joomla forum component on JED
4 most popular forum components: ( stats taken from JED as of 05/07/2010 )
Kunena: Views 375445 Favoured 274
Joo!BB: Views 131204 Favoured 42
Agora: Views 310836 Favoured 206
CCboard: Views 152420 Favoured 102
EDIT: just checked the stats on your link more closely only to find they are wrong and features current in k1.5 and mark as a X when they are included.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
My only conclusion is that the information is unreliable (as with 90% of what you find on the internet) but it is certainly useful and Lintzy deserves to be complimented for her hard work. I think it would be better to abstract her table and create a new one, here, at www.kunena.com that shows a comparison between K 1.5.12 and K 1.6.
Does anyone feel like making such a table?

Blue Eagle vs. Crypsis reference guide
Read my blog and

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
gjr wrote: Please check this link, a comparison table: installiert.de/table-forums-comparison.html
Somebody update this for Kunena 1.6 - its gonna look very different...

We love stars on the Joomla Extension Directory .

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Could you please be more precise and explain which features should be wrong?Cerberus wrote: EDIT: just checked the stats on your link more closely only to find they are wrong and features current in k1.5 and mark as a X when they are included.
please check if source of information is valid before posting lol
I am sorry, which features did I miss?Matias wrote: It seems that Lintzy has missed some of our features in her chart.
May be in your conclusion, but in real it is not unreliable! Everybody can explore the forums (all are installed) and have a look in front- and in backend. The comparison only lists features that every user can see and proove himself in frontend as well as in backend.sozzled wrote: My only conclusion is that the information is unreliable
fxstein wrote: Somebody update this for Kunena 1.6 - its gonna look very different...
I only can explain that for the comparison on installiert.de . All free forums with at least RC state will become installed - no alpha or beta.
On the startpage of installiert.de is stated in german and english:
But because perhaps 2 or 3 features of Kunena may be missing, to deduce whole comparison would be "unreliable" is distinctive and why I am not surprised about this?So, who discovers mistakes (in content or in my written text), should send me an e-mail,please, you'll find the contact details under "Impressum". The same, if there are missing features. Thanks in advance for your assistance.
@Devs, sorry if something is missing, I would be glad to correct the comparison table, if you let me know, what exactly is missing. Thanks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Its all good. Great work as always!
Might get ready for a large Kunena 1.6 upgrade of that list. You will have some editing to do.

Here are a few new categories you don't have on that list like Joomla menu integration (all navigation controlled via Joomla menus), Joomla router integration (multiple separate sub forums on a single website), Joomla module integration, Minified CSS and JS for faster page loads, color coded categories, Joomla version support: 1.0, 1.5 & 1.6 (turns our there are still hundreds of thousands of Joomla 1.0 sites out there), community wiki, ...
The changelog for 1.6 is over 2,000 lines long. We will get you a compiled list of all the new features and functions.
Hope this helps!
We love stars on the Joomla Extension Directory .

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.