- Posts: 7329
- Thank you received: 1434
Kunena 6.3.7 Released
The Kunena team has announce the arrival of Kunena 6.3.7 [K 6.3.7] in stable which is now available for download as a native Joomla extension for J! 4.4.x/5.0.x/5.1.x/5.2.x. This version addresses most of the issues that were discovered in K 6.2 / K 6.3 and issues discovered during the last development stages of K 6.3
Note: Please go to the Kunena Dashboard after an upgrade so that the Kunena database tables are also updated.
Question NoFollow attribute being used on internal links to Forum Categories and Topics
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eSilverStrike
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 44
- Thank you received: 2
Looking forward to the next release.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
All topics are be crawled by the category index page. So you need have a active index menu item. Else you need to edit 1 parameter on your template.
Will create a example when the fix is done.
On K5.1 I will create a new option for each page, and will do it on a new backend view.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- eSilverStrike
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 44
- Thank you received: 2
Also I notice you use rel="follow" on a few links which is not valid HTML anymore. See: www.w3schools.com/tags/att_a_rel.asp
Thanks for the hard work.
Tom
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I am investigating the use of canonical urls and I am running into some 'issues' with my site / forum.
According to Google there are some 'mistakes' when implementing canonical url's ( webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/5-comm...th-relcanonical.html
#3 - Unintended or multiple declarations of rel=canonical
#5 - rel=canonical in the <body>
So what I learned from this document: there can only be one link rel = canonical per webpage and that link should be in the head of the page not the body.
What I am seeing in the forum is that there are multiple canonical referrals in the body.
But and that worries me the most: when using kunena discuss, there are also multiple canonical urls on the article page (for every comment) > possibly conflicting with the intended (and correct) canonical url in the article itself?
When looking at this page: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Link_types
I cannot find a valid 'rel=canonical' for <a hrefs as these are used on the kunena forum pages (topic links)
Am I missing something?
sharing = caring
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.