- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 0
Kunena 6.2.5 & module Kunena Latest 6.0.7 released
The Kunena team has announce the arrival of Kunena 6.2.5 [K 6.2.5] which is now available for download as a native Joomla extension for J! 4.3.x/4.4.x/5.0.x. This version addresses most of the issues that were discovered in K 6.1 / K 6.2 and issues discovered during the last development stages of K 6.2
This category may also contain a few topics relating to K 1.6 that may have been moved here possibly by mistake.
The topics in this category are for historical interest only. Owing to the structural differences between K 1.6 and K 1.7, the ideas in these topics may not work with later versions and, for that reason, the topics are locked.
Question Community Builder: the right option?
Joomunity is free (when I go to their website), but some people here say it is too expensive...?!?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Visit the Kunena documantation .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mr Livered
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 79
- Thank you received: 0
Haven't tried it yet though!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- woonydanny
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 694
- Thank you received: 21
i think as well that the joomlapolis site needs a revamp. Get a new better looking and functioning forum like Kunena (then they would know the issues that occur with Kunena and CB integration!!).
Also i think the CB Paid Subscriptions system is aimed too high. It is a commercial venture that would only be useful for large sites and corporations, but then i think if a business or site with a large turnover to generate the sales of that nature would have a more custom (and probably not joomla site). I think the Paid Subscriptions could be made into a commercial licence with no ongoing costs, as otherwise it means smaller websites cant use it.
The CB team need some designers and css gurus to undertake a big templating drive and make heaps of cool templates (aka jomsocial style and more). They could do this by doing a fundraising drive then paying a designer to do it. The engine of CB is great and is stable but it doesnt "sell" itself and looks a bit outdated thats all. a revamp of the joomlapolis site as well would help, i think there is a large enough community to all chip in and fundraise more template and design work.
Anyway just some thoughts.
still wish that i can write my forum signature through a jomsocial plugin and do it from my jomsocial profile
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The CB team need some designers and css gurus to undertake a big templating drive and make heaps of cool templates (aka jomsocial style and more). They could do this by doing a fundraising drive then paying a designer to do it. The engine of CB is great and is stable but it doesnt "sell" itself and looks a bit outdated thats all. a revamp of the joomlapolis site as well would help, i think there is a large enough community to all chip in and fundraise more template and design work.
Anyway just some thoughts.
Totally Agree
Default template looks dull as if some HTML Student done it.
Also, the CSS of new CB1.2 is so so BAD that I am still staying with CB1.1.
CB1.2's CSS is totally mess specially with tables.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mr Livered
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 79
- Thank you received: 0
What's wrong with it? Is it badly written, or difficult to customise, or what?Default template looks dull as if some HTML Student done it.
Also, the CSS of new CB1.2 is so so BAD that I am still staying with CB1.1.
CB1.2's CSS is totally mess specially with tables.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Blue Eagle vs. Crypsis reference guide
Read my blog and
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mr Livered
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 79
- Thank you received: 0
Is that a standard install of Joom Gallery you have there? It integrates nicely and looks far easier to use than whatever they're using on Joomlapolis.
Did you have pre-existing users before you installed CB, and if so did the install go ok?
Many thanks again. it's very reassuring to see that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
You're most welcome, mate!Thanks very much, I like that a lot.
Is that a standard install of Joom Gallery you have there? It integrates nicely and looks far easier to use than whatever they're using on Joomlapolis.
Did you have pre-existing users before you installed CB, and if so did the install go ok?
Many thanks again. it's very reassuring to see that.
I'm using the standard JoomGallery 1.5 RC2 (latest release) from www.en.joomgallery.net/ . To integrate this with CB, I used JoomGallery's "Gallery Tab Plugin" ( www.en.joomgallery.net/downloads/view-do...cb-gallerytab-3.html ).
I have no idea whether the Joomlapolis website uses JoomGallery.
I had developed several demonstration sites before I built the one you visited. The short answer is "yes", I had existing users (registered the standard Joomla way) before I installed CB. They were migrated into CB quite seamlessly. In the version you visited, I installed CB before I made the site available to the public. Keep this thought in mind, though: you always have at least one user before you install CB ... the site administrator!
Cheers
sozz
Blue Eagle vs. Crypsis reference guide
Read my blog and
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
peetree21 wrote:
The CB team need some designers and css gurus to undertake a big templating drive and make heaps of cool templates (aka jomsocial style and more). They could do this by doing a fundraising drive then paying a designer to do it. The engine of CB is great and is stable but it doesnt "sell" itself and looks a bit outdated thats all. a revamp of the joomlapolis site as well would help, i think there is a large enough community to all chip in and fundraise more template and design work.
Anyway just some thoughts.
Totally Agree
Default template looks dull as if some HTML Student done it.
Also, the CSS of new CB1.2 is so so BAD that I am still staying with CB1.1.
CB1.2's CSS is totally mess specially with tables.
thanks for the compliments on the engine, that's where our focus was for over a year.
yes, we still have some work on the look
CB 1.2's CSS html-markup has been improved over CB 1.1, with the help of a (paid) professional designer.
There is a new MyCommunity template too (commercial) as result of those improvements (which will hopefully help paying back for the investment in the designer, as well as help doing more improvements).
Anyway, as I'm surprised about the critics on css markup, could you please give exact things which you see being wrong ?
We will gladly fix/improve it.
Beat
CB Team
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.